The right to life is a foundational Constitutional right.
Americans must understand the federal government is not an inherent producer of funds. It is our tax money brokered by the federal government which is being used unconstitutionally and against our sincerely held beliefs.
We must roll back and challenge the constitutionality of the administrative state which assigns so much financing and elect a congress that does the job we are elected to do.
We must properly convey this.
The truth is neither partisan or complex. It's the lies we tell to subvert the truth which are.
For that reason the truth in universal law, when properly convey will resonate with all.
In doing so not only ""winning"" a "culture war"; but more importantly brining forth the most perfect union by conveying the beautiful depth of resonance in universal law The Constitution is rooted on.
I could give an electable and generic answer to this question to appease the conservative primary base which primary winner takes congress, that would be the easy and establishment thing to do.
However we have serious problems in America today which require radical fortitude, courage, introspection, facts, discernment and faith so I was answer this question the way I would if you were a progressive, liberal Democrat. It is only the deepest, most resonant calm but certain truth that will win our cause and set them free.
That truth is that there is no way to splice abortion from the fact it is a premeditated termination of a life that would otherwise come to be without its force. This the same framework used in court, the George Floyd cause or otherwise.
Further, abortion is not about woman's rights and it never was, It is about trivializing death.
This evident by the LGBT communities' Pre and Post Exposure Prophylaxis.
You see, like birth control pre-exposure prophylaxis is taken every day to avoid contracting HIV. Like birth control people forget to take it and may have an encounter or exposure thereafter. HIV exposure like pregnancy may derive from rape, incest or otherwise.
Unlike abortion however HIV does not negotiate.
Should any of the above occur, one has only 72h to get on post exposure prophylaxis from the point of exposure or encounter.
The point of exposure or encounter, universally that is the timestamp medically relevant, not from the point of a positive test.
However you do not see democrats boycotting and protesting HIV or any prophylaxis.
Because science, viruses and medicine do not negotiate.
Should The Constitutional right to life be treated at least with the same seriousness as HIV?
That is the question we are asking liberals.
With that said, beyond The Constitution right to life, if you believe in a higher power (which I do) you understand the world of reaction is an inverted paradigm. It brings one to a perpetually responsive state by which response would derive from the deepest and most obfuscated blind sports which would be first to trigger any reactive state.
For that reason we need elected officials who deeply understand the root of their deepest sincerely held beliefs to the inception of Universal Law so they understand how to reframe the question.
"Under what circumstances should the adjudication of life be deferred to the carrying body?"
That's where deductive reasoning, faith, The Constitution and its Universal Law breaks from man.
We cannot be the arbiters of life and death without becoming the same we attempt to prevent.
For that reason my simple answer to the above question is when a mother's life is at risk from it. We cannot adjudicate that process without committing the same charge driving us.
To my previous point about reaction and reactivity, I will now introduce proactivity, solutions and end game.
When one is proactive one is living on purpose in free will met by discernment upon introspection, contrast and resonance.
They are operating in knowing willingness from their experience and level of perception.
[I am deeply against interventionism as it pertains to the sovereign journey to discovery of the highest and most finite resonance by contrasting resonance in the gamut of the human experience in accordance with the free will tenant of Universal Law. For that reason it is not in my belief it is the role of Government to adjudicate the process of Life, Liberty and the Pursuit of Happiness only to facilitate it.
Here you must personally discern if your goal is to end abortions in protection of the sanctity of life or if it is to prosecute women and discern priority.
My end being we no longer on ponder on abortions at large, as it pertains to rape, incest, etc. I belief we should be proactive in the facilitation of birth control, plan B, education, reversible vasectomies, IUD's with grace on the bride to abortion no longer being a common state of preponderance upon the American social memory complex.
This may not as convenient, easy, digestible or politically correct answer, but it's the only honest answer and solution I see.
In accordance with the Free Will tenant of Universal Law by which liberty derives from, this goes back to you.
Do you really want solutions, change, liberty and life?
Do you want another day of logical justification and ideological complacency?
That is the crossroads America in its lead of the world social memory is at.
In you, The future of our social memory.